Too much or Tuesday Morning Associations.
MDA Memorial Day Associations?
Glenn Greenwald The Intercept.
Lede or Ship?
A. quarter backing
B. NYT Trumpets US Restraint Against ISIS, Ignores Hundreds of Civilian Deaths
C. Noam Chomsky: Are the Media Still 'Manufacturing Consent'?
B was read before ABC were footnoted such, and pre-A~QB.
The inspiration was anticipation of perspectivism on the part of these sources. After reading Greenwald, the subject was perspectivism in the face of restraint.
Update: Sunday Related Difficulties Resolved*
*not exactly.
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Greenwald. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Greenwald. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Monday, June 08, 2015
Green Walled Parallel
Not exactly the lesson.
The LA Times piece was much more fair and balanced* than The Intercept "editorial". Snowden was not the author of the legislation, congress was. Glenn Greenwald's journalism(or logic) on this matter might lead me to give the Republican Party credit for the recovery**.
*I've decapitalized and un-quotation marked for sake of irony
[Rumsfeld/Korb All In for American Progress]
** if it wasn't the LA Times that made the claim on authorship
The LA Times piece was much more fair and balanced* than The Intercept "editorial". Snowden was not the author of the legislation, congress was. Glenn Greenwald's journalism(or logic) on this matter might lead me to give the Republican Party credit for the recovery**.
*I've decapitalized and un-quotation marked for sake of irony
[Rumsfeld/Korb All In for American Progress]
** if it wasn't the LA Times that made the claim on authorship
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Miranda Warning!
Stand your legislation. *
Pun on knot or Tan Gent shall ?
* [See ***] (snow den) Greenwald/Miranda** FISA ?
** a, b, c
[Not to pun on keeping quite, but hear, here to facing charges, and progress on transparency in a sea of non-Cents.]
[*** links 1 & 2 inserted post asterisks & are yet to reads]
[Yet knot! ... Everything is(a) not open to transparency, not to mention not too Aeschylus.]
( ( 9 9 9 ) ) [links minus 4]
8-21-13 Saved in Draft: House/NOW/Harman - Knee. Knot ... ? Who nows[!]
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
The Fighting Ill Lie Nigh!
Robert Greenwald on the Koch brothers on The Ed Show.
Who thinks whom is stupid?***
I'll trump your "campaign of diversions, distractions, and distortions."
Who thinks whom is stupid?***
I'll trump your "campaign of diversions, distractions, and distortions."
The Ill Lie Nigh crack goes to the reality of the campaign, regardless and inspite of the truth. Buy this, I mean, you better not buy it. Some on the Right have misused Illinois, making it a good example of this twist.*
And in regards to the youth wars, it is not so much that students have such huge debts from college**, it is that Republicans want to increase the interest at that.
** no disrespect to the Illini.
*** Speaking of Q&A^: Do not ask what good we do. On The Last Word.
[^ 4-26-12 Related: Krugman^^/ Bernstein / Twist?]
^^ This is the only one of the last four I have read complete.
^^^ INET
*** Speaking of Q&A^: Do not ask what good we do. On The Last Word.
[^ 4-26-12 Related: Krugman^^/ Bernstein / Twist?]
^^ This is the only one of the last four I have read complete.
^^^ INET
Friday, June 05, 2015
Hardball
I'm selling you guys.
He says to two Republicans, so he can take 'em down?
Then All In with Voting Flights! Provisional Balloting?
Cotton Pick-in Vote
Tom Cotton: The enemy gets a vote.
And the legal progress of Snowden / Greenwald.
He says to two Republicans, so he can take 'em down?
Then All In with Voting Flights! Provisional Balloting?
Cotton Pick-in Vote
Tom Cotton: The enemy gets a vote.
And the legal progress of Snowden / Greenwald.
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
Reader Supported News
from VICE (X),
VOX,
Bloomberg,
RSN, Rolling Stone, RSN,
Esquire
Scroll over Re:view.
12-23-14
Krugman NYT
Matt Taibbi Rolling Stone
Greenwald/Maass The Intercept
Kevin Lincoln VICE News
Marc Ashe Reader Supported News
Patricia Williams The Guardian UK
John Cassidy The New Yorker
VOX,
Bloomberg,
RSN, Rolling Stone, RSN,
Esquire
Scroll over Re:view.
12-23-14
Krugman NYT
Matt Taibbi Rolling Stone
Greenwald/Maass The Intercept
Kevin Lincoln VICE News
Marc Ashe Reader Supported News
Patricia Williams The Guardian UK
John Cassidy The New Yorker
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right.
Stuck in the game frame?
Bright Bart and Big Government?
Why OWS is bigger...
[Then I signed the petition at DCCC (see bold) "I stand..." with the following amendments.(see 3 links)]
[Each of the above blockquotes are directly from Matt Taibbi's piece, with the bold segues my comments. But the final Really?, "Both traditional constituencies want these companies off the public teat and back swimming on their own in the cruel seas of the free market, where they will inevitably be drowned in their corruption and greed, if they don't reform immediately." sounds a bit naive if not libertarian. Companies and Wall Street will not reform themselves any more than they will let themselves fail or let the market do its magic. But it is a matter of who's on board or overboard as well as some sort of tents.]
[Speaking of ironies, or Bright Bart and Big Government, just whose side is who on?]
[Meanwhile I have four posts to further parse. Starting with the big bite. @ 7 minutes 15 seconds in: Over two thirds of New Yorkers support Occupy Wall Street.]

[Oh what a web. No E.B. White:
SCroll up! Tol Keen? Rubric, Elements, what "October", Mis-attribute? Justice and/or sand witchbracket.]
[Alternative Reich? Not to pun on the furor, but is there an alternative?]
[A Democratic* strategist touched on something(on Martin Bashir) that has been embedded in my thoughts, and even more embedded in my writings. The Republican candidate will not come from the activist wing. And indeed the current leader often trails "anybody else". Well, they are not really polling that candidate, but the leaders are still struggling for less than a third of the Republican's votes(current Gallup Romney 20%). My point is that there just might be a compromise or coalition candidate. On the other hand... who am I to say democracy will prevail over the Republic?]
* 10-19-11 I have yet to find the proper link but place some others under Democratic Strategist and Martin Bashir.
Bright Bart and Big Government?
Why OWS is bigger...
Tactically, what we'll see here will be a) people firmly on the traditional Democratic side claiming to speak for OWS, and b) people on the right-Republican side attempting to portray OWS as a puppet of well-known liberals and other Democratic interests.Whine and G's?
On the Democratic side, we've already seen a lot of this behavior, particularly in the last week or so. Glenn Greenwald wrote about this a lot last week, talking about how Obama has already made it clear that he is "on the same side as the Wall Street protesters" and that the Democratic Party, through the DCCC (its House fundraising arm), has jumped into the fray by circulating a petition seeking 100,000 party supporters to affirm that "I stand with the Occupy Wall Street protests". (I wonder how firmly the DCCC was standing with OWS sentiment back when it was pushing for the bailouts and the repeal of Glass-Steagall Act).Really?
What nobody is comfortable with is a movement in which virtually the entire spectrum of middle class and poor Americans is on the same page, railing against incestuous political and financial corruption on Wall Street and in Washington. The reality is that Occupy Wall Street and the millions of middle Americans who make up the Tea Party are natural allies and should be on the same page about most of the key issues, and that's a story our media won't want to or know how to handle.Not your grandfather's "traditional".
This is an issue for the traditional "left" because it's a classic instance of overweening corporate power - but it's an issue for the traditional "right" because these same institutions are also the biggest welfare bums of all time, de facto wards of the state who sucked trillions of dollars of public treasure from the pockets of patriotic taxpayers from coast to coastReally?
Both traditional constituencies want these companies off the public teat and back swimming on their own in the cruel seas of the free market, where they will inevitably be drowned in their corruption and greed, if they don't reform immediately. This is a major implicit complaint of the OWS protests and it should absolutely strike a nerve with Tea Partiers, many of whom were talking about some of the same things when they burst onto the scene a few years ago.I have read Matt Taibbi's piece three times now over the course of parsing this, and I will let you read your own conclusions.
[Then I signed the petition at DCCC (see bold) "I stand..." with the following amendments.(see 3 links)]
[Each of the above blockquotes are directly from Matt Taibbi's piece, with the bold segues my comments. But the final Really?, "Both traditional constituencies want these companies off the public teat and back swimming on their own in the cruel seas of the free market, where they will inevitably be drowned in their corruption and greed, if they don't reform immediately." sounds a bit naive if not libertarian. Companies and Wall Street will not reform themselves any more than they will let themselves fail or let the market do its magic. But it is a matter of who's on board or overboard as well as some sort of tents.]
[Speaking of ironies, or Bright Bart and Big Government, just whose side is who on?]
[Meanwhile I have four posts to further parse. Starting with the big bite. @ 7 minutes 15 seconds in: Over two thirds of New Yorkers support Occupy Wall Street.]

[Oh what a web. No E.B. White:
SCroll up! Tol Keen? Rubric, Elements, what "October", Mis-attribute? Justice and/or sand witchbracket.]
[Alternative Reich? Not to pun on the furor, but is there an alternative?]
[A Democratic* strategist touched on something(on Martin Bashir) that has been embedded in my thoughts, and even more embedded in my writings. The Republican candidate will not come from the activist wing. And indeed the current leader often trails "anybody else". Well, they are not really polling that candidate, but the leaders are still struggling for less than a third of the Republican's votes(current Gallup Romney 20%). My point is that there just might be a compromise or coalition candidate. On the other hand... who am I to say democracy will prevail over the Republic?]
* 10-19-11 I have yet to find the proper link but place some others under Democratic Strategist and Martin Bashir.
Saturday, October 03, 2009
Update
[UNDER CONSTRUCTION]
[ Seattle P.I. ]
[ Seatlle Examiner ]
[ The Reporter ]
[ Seattle Times ]
[ The Big Blog ]
[ Hmmmmmm. ] [*]
[ --membmer? Re : -) ]
TODAY
Who are "the deciders"? David Sirota
Iran: More accomplished in one day of negotiations than in 8 years of threats Glenn Greenwald
The top 10 things you did not know about Iran Juan Cole
Tool Shed 10-2-09
the case we are in 10-2-09
{under glass} 10-2-09
Turning 10-2-09
10-1-09 Teeter Totter Ribble (a river and a cycle)
Under Over 9-30-09 [*] Hmmmm?
In Balance 9-30-09
[ Seattle P.I. ]
[ Seatlle Examiner ]
[ The Reporter ]
[ Seattle Times ]
[ The Big Blog ]
[ Hmmmmmm. ] [*]
[ --membmer? Re : -) ]
TODAY
Who are "the deciders"? David Sirota
Iran: More accomplished in one day of negotiations than in 8 years of threats Glenn Greenwald
The top 10 things you did not know about Iran Juan Cole
Tool Shed 10-2-09
the case we are in 10-2-09
{under glass} 10-2-09
Turning 10-2-09
10-1-09 Teeter Totter Ribble (a river and a cycle)
Under Over 9-30-09 [*] Hmmmm?
In Balance 9-30-09
Tuesday, April 07, 2015
Oliver Uncumber Bash?
This is discuss`ding. But what the frack 'n bleep do I know?
Spoiler Alert: Culturally Radical Journalism-- If you are offended by fowl references spare yourself the irritation[!] View at the risk of your own democracy.
Other BS?
RSN: Glenn Greenwald
Slate: Jack Shafer
Spoiler Alert: Culturally Radical Journalism-- If you are offended by fowl references spare yourself the irritation[!] View at the risk of your own democracy.
Other BS?
RSN: Glenn Greenwald
Slate: Jack Shafer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)